BOCATER quadrante1
SP (11)
BOCATER quadrante2
SP (12)
BOCATER quadrante3
SP (13)

News

Differentiated reports
and analyses

Follow the main debates on issues related to our practice areas through our newsletters and media stories published by the country’s main press outlets with the participation of our lawyers.

On 14 April, our partner Maria Isabel do Prado Bocater and our partner João Laudo de Camargo will take part in the event “Corporate Fraud”, organised by the Corporate Compliance Committee of the Rio de Janeiro Bar Association (OAB/RJ). João will take part in the opening session alongside

In an article published in the “Palavra do Gestor” column of Valor Econômico, our partner João Laudo de Camargo and our lawyer Luiz Pompeu discuss the CVM’s “Fácil” Regime, which came into force on 16 March with CVM Resolution 232, which set out its rules. The Regime for

In a report published this week, the Investidor Institucional website reported that the Superior Labour Court (TST) ruled on Monday (23 March) that the labour courts do not have jurisdiction to hear claims for compensation brought by members of deficit-ridden supplementary pension schemes against the sponsoring companies. According

#

For yet another year, Bocater Advogados has been ranked among the country’s leading law firms in the field of Civil and Commercial Litigation by Leaders League Brasil, in a new round of dispute resolution surveys recently published. In addition to the firm, the publication also highlighted Bruno Carriello,

In an article published by Migalhas, our senior partner Flavio Martins Rodrigues, our partner Thiago Araújo and our solicitor Ana Luiza Moerbeck analyse the Supreme Court’s decision to recognise the Federal Court of Accounts’ (TCU) jurisdiction to oversee pension funds. In the article, however, they emphasise that this

Investidor Institucional has published an article on the ruling on Issue 24, scheduled to take place at the Superior Labour Court (TST) next Monday, 23 March, which addresses whether the labour courts have jurisdiction to hear claims for compensation brought by members of deficit-ridden supplementary pension schemes against